Introduction
Scientists approximate that bacteria first appeared on Earth
around 3.5 billion years ago, while the first eukaryotes were not thought to
inhabit Earth until approximately 1.5 billion years ago. What happened in this
time gap of 2 billion years? Well, scientists can only make an educational guess,
considering that primates likely did not come to be until approximately 65
million years ago (1). The endosymbiosis theory points to perhaps the earliest
known form of mutualism in which bacteria are thought to have inhabited a “primordial
eukaryotic cell” (2). The presence of a bacterial organism inside the larger
cell allowed cellular life to adapt to the harsh conditions of the time.
Scientists believe that photosynthetic bacteria appeared 3.2 million years ago,
thereby releasing oxygen into the atmosphere. Oxygen can actually be a toxic
substance, but the first aerobic bacteria lived about 2.5 billion years ago,
very shortly before the first aerobic eukaryotes. These inferences, among many
other observations, point to the endosymbiosis theory as a plausible
explanation for adaption to an environment abundant in oxygen (1).
Endosymbiosis Theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DzzR76jj1k&feature=related
Cost/Benefit Analysis
Why would we think that bacteria would crawl inside of
another cell? Well, we assume that in a mutualistic relationship, both parties
benefit due to the relationship. Additionally, the endosymbiosis theory suggests
that mitochondria and chloroplasts’ lineages can be traced back to ancient
bacteria. Not only are these structures about the size of a bacterium (70S),
but these organelles also contain their own DNA in the form of one circular
chromosome like bacteria (3). Both bacteria and the organelles replicate via
binary fission (1).
Rickettsia prowazekki http://www.human-healths.com/rickettsia-prowazekii/rickettsia-prowazekii.php |
Although this background information is necessary in
understanding the basic evolution of the eukaryotic cell, I would like to
specifically examine the relationship between mitochondria (derived from ancient
bacteria) and the primitive eukaryotic cell. As previously stated, at the time
of the initial endosymbiotic encounter, few species were equipped to convert
oxygen into another substance to avoid oxidation. Therefore, the host cell
greatly benefitted from its smaller counterpart because mitochondria convert
oxygen to ATP via substrate-level phosphorylation. Today, researchers have
evidence to suggest the mitochondria are related to the proteobacterium Rickettsia prowazekii, “an obligate
intracellular parasite” (3) due to its similarity in genomic sequence. Although
it is not exactly clear why the bacterium benefitted from the relationship, it
can be inferred that the bacterium was provided a “safe” environment to reside
in a chemically stable environment. This idea applies to chloroplasts as well.
Mitochondria and the Cell
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/cells/mitochondria/mitochondria.html |
To understand the role of early bacteria in the cell, let us
look at the function of a mitochondrion. Ultimately converting oxygen to ATP, mitochondria
are the powerhouses of a cell through their production of energy. Mitochondria
have two membranes, of which the outer membrane, containing porins, resembles Gram-negative
bacteria. The inner membrane contains cristae, infoldings that greatly increase
surface area. The inside of the mitochondria, the mitochondrial matrix,
contains ribosomes (similar to size of those of bacteria), DNA, and calcium
phosphate granules. The DNA and ribosomes are used to synthesize some of its
proteins (3).
The mitochondrion is the location of the tricarboxylic acid
cycle (TCA), production of ATP, and oxidative phosphorylation. In the TCA cycle, pyruvate is oxidized and
cleaved to form CO2 and acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA), an
energy-rich molecule. After a series of reactions on acetyl-CoA, NADH and FADH2
are formed, which are both electron carriers. This reaction also yields
four ATP molecules. The electron carriers formed in the TCA cycle are active
players in the electron transport chain, as electrons are transferred to
acceptors such as oxygen. The electron transport chain involves an energy
gradient within the inner membrane of the mitochondria in eukaryotes and in the
plasma membrane in prokaryotes. In this process, NADH is oxidized to NAD+,
while the electrons are transferred to other molecules (such as oxgygen) with
more positive reduction potentials. Oxidative phosphorylation is the result of
the electron transport chain, in which protons move across the mitochondrial membrane
and ultimately produce a maximum of 34 ATPs. These processes are very
simplified, as more complex explanations involve in-depth biochemistry (3).
Through these complicated processes in the mitochondria,
eukaryotic cells are able to reap the benefits of an abundant amount of energy
to sustain more complex forms of life. Although the TCA cycle and electron
transport chain produce small amounts of ATP, oxidative phosphorylation allows
for 34 molecules of ATP to be produced.
Mitochondria and the Body
An eye that has been affected by optic neuropathy. http://www2.cfpc.ca/cfp/2003/Oct/vol49-oct-clinical-2.asp |
We already have an idea of how beneficial mitochondria are
to sustaining life, but what happens when mitochondria start to malfunction? As
already mentioned, mitochondria contain their own DNA. Mitochondria are passed
from mother to offspring in the cytoplasm of the egg. Over 200 human diseases
are caused by mutations in DNA due to mitochondrial DNA’s inability to repair,
unlike nuclear DNA. Most of these diseases come about in cells that require an
abundance of ATP, such as muscle and nerve cells. Several examples of dysfunctional
mitochondria-caused diseases are the following: optic neuropathy, often
resulting in blindness; neurogenic muscle weakness; maternal and
cardiomyopathy; and myoclonic epilepsy (2). Regardless of the primitive
bacteria-eukaryotic cell relationship, it is apparent that eukaryotic cells
have become very dependent on mitochondria to sustain life.
References
(1) The Endosymbiotic Theory. (2004, February 18).
Retrieved from http://www.biology.iupui.edu/biocourses/N100/2k4endosymb.html.
(2)
Brooker, R. J. (2009). Genetics: Analysis &
Principles. (4 ed., pp. 119-120). New York: McGraw Hill. Print.
(3) Willey, Sherwood, and Woolverton. (2008). Microbiology. (7 ed., pp. 88
and 476-478). New York: McGraw Hill. Print.
google 1927
ReplyDeletegoogle 1928
google 1929
google 1930
google 1931
google 1932
google 1933
google 1934